(Excerpted from the CDR Leadership Risk Assessment)
Leadership success and
derailment largely depend upon two factors:
1) the perceptions of others about your performance which includes your
relationships with them; and
2) your contributions or results produced for the
good of the organization.
Overwhelmingly, the first of these is the most critical in terms of
leadership derailment. A leader may have
produced outstanding results; yet if he/she has damaged relationships along the
way, or has operated with a lack of integrity, derailment may be
inevitable. Universally, or across
organizations, leadership derailers can be defined as:
LEADERSHIP DERAILERS
|
Examples
|
1. Erosion or betrayal of trust
|
lack of integrity (honesty, acting congruently with core values, showing respect, etc.), loss of
credibility, over-focus on personal agenda, failure
to meet commitments
|
2. Failure to deliver and be accountable
|
slow to act, studies
issues and solutions too long, waits for instruction,
short on results
|
3. Failure to adapt
|
resists change, difficulty
with multiple priorities, lacks flexibility
|
4. Lack of courage and decisiveness
|
risk aversive, freezes
under uncertainty, fails to assert views; avoids
making decisions
|
5. Creating or endorsing a dysfunctional work environment
|
failure to support staff, displays inappropriate emotionality or lack of "emotional
intelligence", supports or tolerates hostile work environment
|
6. Failure to develop people and organization
|
fails to coach, mentor
others, or provide developmental resources; and, unconcerned with bench strength,organizational growth
planning issues
|
7. Lacks forward-looking and inspirational approach
|
lacks a vision, can't
rally troops to produce; does not build enthusiasm toward
stretch goals
|
8. Lack of objectivity and broadmindedness
|
narrow views, undervalues
diversity, strives to preserve personal wishes and bias,
not perceived as fair, shows favoritism, does not consider sufficient views
or sufficient data in decision making
|